African Americans are overrepresented among reported coronavirus cases and deaths. A multitude of factors may explain the disparity in COVID-19 outcomes, including higher rates of comorbidities and implicit bias. To address this, we must apply a health equity lens and disaggregate the data.

April 21, 2020

African Americans are overrepresented among reported coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths in the United States. In Michigan, for example, where African Americans represent 14% of the population, they account for more than 30% of COVID-19 cases and more than 40% of deaths. The disparity in Chicago is more troubling. African Americans represent 70% of the COVID-19 deaths but only 29% of the city population.

There is a multitude of factors that may explain the African American disparity in COVID-19 deaths, including higher rates of comorbid health conditions such as hypertension and cardiovascular disease, barriers to health-care access, and differences in cultural attitudes.

While these individual-level factors predictably contribute to disparate COVID-19 outcomes, systematic and structural factors have not yet been reported. It is conceivable, even plausible, that African Americans are dying from COVID-19 at higher rates because these patients are more likely to have a ‘‘do not resuscitate" directive, commonly referred to as a DNR.

The extant literature demonstrates African Americans, compared to whites, are far less likely to endorse a DNR and, in fact, have a preference for life-prolonging care. For example, Mack et al. examined differences in end-of-life care among a sample of patients with advanced cancer. They found that African Americans were nearly three times less likely than whites to have DNR orders. Medical mistrust and fear of receiving inadequate medical care are consistently hypothesized mediators for fewer DNR orders among African American patients.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, however, it is possible that despite patients’ (and their families’) wishes, medical personnel are making the decision of whether to apply life-prolonging measures. It is also possible that African American patients are disproportionately being encouraged to agree to a DNR. The lack of published data or statistical reports on DNR rates for African Americans with COVID-19 leaves many questions unanswered.

• Are African Americans being steered toward DNRs during a the COVID-19 pandemic?
• Are African Americans less likely to be offered early intubation and ventilation during COVID-19?
• Are physicians and other medical personnel less aggressive with treatment or disproportionately not offering African American patients all treatment options?

This premise—that a patient would be encouraged to change their code status to DNR or would be otherwise denied lifesaving treatment because of their race—has precedence. Multiple studies support this supposition. Ezer et al. found that blacks had lower rates of lung resection (the definitive treatment for early-stage lung cancer), even after controlling for access to care, preexisting health conditions, and other demographics, including sex and socioeconomic status. The study investigators inferred that the underlying bias of the surgeon who consulted for the lung resection may have contributed to racial differences in the rates of lung resection. Stated differently, the bias of the surgeon may have negatively impacted the course of treatment and subsequent treatment outcomes for African Americans. Another study found that blacks diagnosed with bone fractures were less likely to be prescribed opioids for pain control compared to white patients. This study also found that black patients who were prescribed opioids were less likely to receive a concurrent prescription for naloxone, a commonly used reversal agent to prevent and reduce opioid overdose death. We surmise that implicit bias is the culprit.

Implicit (or unconscious) biases are the stereotypes or preferences for or against groups of people that are held by individuals who are unaware of them and, as a result, are unable (or highly unlikely) to change. This is distinct from the conscious thoughts and feelings that individuals hold about groups of people. Unconscious bias is most problematic because people are unaware that they have a preference for or against people based on factors such as race, age, or gender—to name but a few. A systematic review of studies assessing racial/ethnic implicit biases using implicit association tests among health care providers was published in 2018.

Three major themes related to health care providers’ implicit biases and patient interactions emerged: (1) the majority of health care providers demonstrated implicit biases against African Americans; (2) African American health care providers demonstrated lower implicit biases overall; and (3) stronger implicit biases among providers were associated with worse patient-provider communication. These biases often persist, even after accounting for patient-level factors.

It stands to reason that implicit biases are impacting conversations that well-trained and well-meaning medical personnel are having with African American COVID-19 patients and their families about code status and disease management. This alone will likely result in a smaller number of critically ill African American patients with COVID-19 being placed on a ventilator—a virtual death sentence. Admittedly, the health-care system was not prepared to handle the large influx of patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. Overburdened providers are now forced to make tough decisions with scarce resources, and their unconscious biases will likely amplify the health disparities gap.

The problem of implicit bias in the health care system is not new. In fact, it was noted in the 2003 Institute of Medicine Report, Unequal Treatment. The COVID-19 pandemic should be a call for radical intervention and policies to ensure that providers are screened for implicit bias and provided evidence-based feedback and training to move those biases from the unconscious to the conscious. There is evidence that once people are aware of their biases and receive training and feedback, they can change their behaviors.

Moving forward, we must apply a health equity lens and disaggregate data explicitly for African Americans, as well as other populations at risk for biased treatment in the health care system, including women and nongender confirming sexual minorities, incarcerated and other institutionalized persons, the disabled, the elderly, non-native English speakers, undocumented residents—the list is endless.

The health care system and all of its agents, policymakers, and elected officials are all accountable to ensure that our social and political determinants of health no longer disproportionately burden the groups most at risk for unfair or inequitable treatment but strive to deliver our systems best care. The bridge between public health and medicine also needs to be strengthened such that the findings of population studies can be more readily translated to improve our current health care delivery system.

Or . . . maybe we are okay with the alarming rate of COVID-19 deaths among African Americans, applying our usual explanations that they are sicker, poorer, and have less access to care. Maybe health disparities are the inalienable truth and status quo in America. Accepting this reality will not increase the capacity of well-meaning medical staff to help all people fairly and belies the self-evident principles on which this country was founded. We (a collective of African American physicians and public health professionals) are sounding the alarm that we seize this opportunity to address the health disparities and systematic inequities that continue to result in premature mortality and shortened life expectancy among African Americans and other disadvantaged, disenfranchised, and already marginalized populations.

###

Published in Health Equity 4:1, 139–141, DOI: 10.1089/heq.2020.0015. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/heq.2020.0015.

Authors Include:
Adam J. Milam,^1,2,* Debra Furr-Holden,^1,2 Jennifer Edwards-Johnson,¹ Birgete Webb,³ John W. Patton III,⁴ Nnayereugo C. Ezekwemba,³ Lekiesha Porter,³ TomMario Davis,⁵ Marius Chukwurah,⁶ Antonio J. Webb,⁷ Kevin Simon,⁸ Geden Franck,⁹ Joshua Anthony,¹⁰ Gerald Onuoha II,¹⁰ Italo M. Brown,⁴ James T. Carson,¹¹ and Brent C. Stephens¹²

¹Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint, Michigan, USA.
¹Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint, Michigan, USA.
²Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
³Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
⁴Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
⁵University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
⁶Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
⁷Texas Back Institute, Plano, Texas, USA.
⁸Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
⁹Memorial Hermann Health System, Houston, Texas, USA.
¹⁰Meharry Medical College, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
¹¹Lone Star Orthopedic Institute, Kingwood, Texas, USA.
¹²Health First, Melbourne, Florida, USA.

Funding Information:
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities(U54MD011227).

References: 
Einhorn E. African Americans may be dying from COVID-19 at a higher rate. Better data is essential, experts say. Available at https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/african-americans-may-be-dying-covid-19-higher-ratebetter-n1178011 Accessed April 8, 2020.

Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in HealthCare. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in HealthCare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2002.

Mack JW, Paulk ME, Viswanath K, et al. Racial disparities in the outcomes of communication on medical care received near death. Arch Intern Med.2010;170:1533–1540.

Shepardson LB, Gordon HS, Ibrahim SA, et al. Racial variation in the use of do-not-resuscitate orders. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:15–20.

Lillemoe K, Lord A, Torres J, et al. Factors Associated with DNR Status AfterNontraumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage. Neurohospitalist. 2019 Sep 22 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI: 10.1177/1941874419873812.

Ezer N, Mhango G, Bagiella E, et al. Racial disparities in resection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: variability among surgeons. Med Care.2020;58:392–398.

Madden EF, Qeadan F. Racial inequities in US naloxone prescriptions. SubstMadden EF, Qeadan F. Racial inequities in US naloxone prescriptions. SubstAbus. 2019 Nov 13 [Epub ahead of print]; DOI:10.1080/08897077.2019.1686721.

Maina IW, Belton TD, Ginzberg S, et al. A decade of studying implicit racial/ethnic bias in healthcare providers using the implicit association test.Soc Sci Med. 2018;199:219–229.